Flawfinder version 2.0.10, (C) 2001-2019 David A. Wheeler.
Number of rules (primarily dangerous function names) in C/C++ ruleset: 223
Examining data/ocaml-fdkaac-0.3.2/src/fdkaac_stubs.c

FINAL RESULTS:

data/ocaml-fdkaac-0.3.2/src/fdkaac_stubs.c:207:3:  [2] (buffer) memcpy:
  Does not check for buffer overflows when copying to destination (CWE-120).
  Make sure destination can always hold the source data.
  memcpy(bufs, String_val(buf)+offset, buflen);
data/ocaml-fdkaac-0.3.2/src/fdkaac_stubs.c:234:3:  [2] (buffer) memcpy:
  Does not check for buffer overflows when copying to destination (CWE-120).
  Make sure destination can always hold the source data.
  memcpy(String_val(ret), outbuf, outArgs.numOutBytes);
data/ocaml-fdkaac-0.3.2/src/fdkaac_stubs.c:272:3:  [2] (buffer) memcpy:
  Does not check for buffer overflows when copying to destination (CWE-120).
  Make sure destination can always hold the source data.
  memcpy(String_val(ret), outbuf, outArgs.numOutBytes);

ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Hits = 3
Lines analyzed = 319 in approximately 0.04 seconds (8975 lines/second)
Physical Source Lines of Code (SLOC) = 219
Hits@level = [0]   0 [1]   0 [2]   3 [3]   0 [4]   0 [5]   0
Hits@level+ = [0+]   3 [1+]   3 [2+]   3 [3+]   0 [4+]   0 [5+]   0
Hits/KSLOC@level+ = [0+] 13.6986 [1+] 13.6986 [2+] 13.6986 [3+]   0 [4+]   0 [5+]   0
Dot directories skipped = 1 (--followdotdir overrides)
Minimum risk level = 1
Not every hit is necessarily a security vulnerability.
There may be other security vulnerabilities; review your code!
See 'Secure Programming HOWTO'
(https://dwheeler.com/secure-programs) for more information.