Flawfinder version 2.0.10, (C) 2001-2019 David A. Wheeler. Number of rules (primarily dangerous function names) in C/C++ ruleset: 223 Examining data/erlang-p1-pam-1.0.9/c_src/epam.c FINAL RESULTS: data/erlang-p1-pam-1.0.9/c_src/epam.c:25:35: [2] (buffer) char: Statically-sized arrays can be improperly restricted, leading to potential overflows or other issues (CWE-119!/CWE-120). Perform bounds checking, use functions that limit length, or ensure that the size is larger than the maximum possible length. #define dec_int16(s) ((((unsigned char *)(s))[0] << 8) | \ data/erlang-p1-pam-1.0.9/c_src/epam.c:26:35: [2] (buffer) char: Statically-sized arrays can be improperly restricted, leading to potential overflows or other issues (CWE-119!/CWE-120). Perform bounds checking, use functions that limit length, or ensure that the size is larger than the maximum possible length. (((unsigned char *)(s))[1])) data/erlang-p1-pam-1.0.9/c_src/epam.c:30:16: [2] (buffer) char: Statically-sized arrays can be improperly restricted, leading to potential overflows or other issues (CWE-119!/CWE-120). Perform bounds checking, use functions that limit length, or ensure that the size is larger than the maximum possible length. ((unsigned char *)(s))[0] = ((i) >> 8) & 0xff; \ data/erlang-p1-pam-1.0.9/c_src/epam.c:31:16: [2] (buffer) char: Statically-sized arrays can be improperly restricted, leading to potential overflows or other issues (CWE-119!/CWE-120). Perform bounds checking, use functions that limit length, or ensure that the size is larger than the maximum possible length. ((unsigned char *)(s))[1] = (i)&0xff; \ data/erlang-p1-pam-1.0.9/c_src/epam.c:115:14: [1] (buffer) read: Check buffer boundaries if used in a loop including recursive loops (CWE-120, CWE-20). if ((i = read(fd, buf + got, len - got)) <= 0) data/erlang-p1-pam-1.0.9/c_src/epam.c:193:11: [1] (buffer) strlen: Does not handle strings that are not \0-terminated; if given one it may perform an over-read (it could cause a crash if unprotected) (CWE-126). len = strlen(errtxt); ANALYSIS SUMMARY: Hits = 6 Lines analyzed = 251 in approximately 0.03 seconds (8579 lines/second) Physical Source Lines of Code (SLOC) = 214 Hits@level = [0] 0 [1] 2 [2] 4 [3] 0 [4] 0 [5] 0 Hits@level+ = [0+] 6 [1+] 6 [2+] 4 [3+] 0 [4+] 0 [5+] 0 Hits/KSLOC@level+ = [0+] 28.0374 [1+] 28.0374 [2+] 18.6916 [3+] 0 [4+] 0 [5+] 0 Dot directories skipped = 1 (--followdotdir overrides) Minimum risk level = 1 Not every hit is necessarily a security vulnerability. There may be other security vulnerabilities; review your code! See 'Secure Programming HOWTO' (https://dwheeler.com/secure-programs) for more information.