Flawfinder version 2.0.10, (C) 2001-2019 David A. Wheeler.
Number of rules (primarily dangerous function names) in C/C++ ruleset: 223
Examining data/jnr-ffi-2.1.7/libtest/Benchmark.c
Examining data/jnr-ffi-2.1.7/libtest/BufferTest.c
Examining data/jnr-ffi-2.1.7/libtest/ClosureTest.c
Examining data/jnr-ffi-2.1.7/libtest/GlobalVariable.c
Examining data/jnr-ffi-2.1.7/libtest/LastErrorTest.c
Examining data/jnr-ffi-2.1.7/libtest/NumberTest.c
Examining data/jnr-ffi-2.1.7/libtest/PointerTest.c
Examining data/jnr-ffi-2.1.7/libtest/ReferenceTest.c
Examining data/jnr-ffi-2.1.7/libtest/StringTest.c
Examining data/jnr-ffi-2.1.7/libtest/StructTest.c

FINAL RESULTS:

data/jnr-ffi-2.1.7/libtest/StringTest.c:30:5:  [4] (buffer) strcpy:
  Does not check for buffer overflows when copying to destination [MS-banned]
  (CWE-120). Consider using snprintf, strcpy_s, or strlcpy (warning: strncpy
  easily misused).
    strcpy(s1, s2);
data/jnr-ffi-2.1.7/libtest/StringTest.c:39:5:  [4] (buffer) strcpy:
  Does not check for buffer overflows when copying to destination [MS-banned]
  (CWE-120). Consider using snprintf, strcpy_s, or strlcpy (warning: strncpy
  easily misused).
    strcpy(ep, src);
data/jnr-ffi-2.1.7/libtest/StructTest.c:63:5:  [4] (buffer) strcpy:
  Does not check for buffer overflows when copying to destination [MS-banned]
  (CWE-120). Consider using snprintf, strcpy_s, or strlcpy (warning: strncpy
  easily misused).
    strcpy(t->string, s);
data/jnr-ffi-2.1.7/libtest/PointerTest.c:42:5:  [2] (buffer) memcpy:
  Does not check for buffer overflows when copying to destination (CWE-120).
  Make sure destination can always hold the source data.
    memcpy((caddr_t) arg1 + offset, &value, sizeof(value)); \
data/jnr-ffi-2.1.7/libtest/StructTest.c:41:5:  [2] (buffer) char:
  Statically-sized arrays can be improperly restricted, leading to potential
  overflows or other issues (CWE-119!/CWE-120). Perform bounds checking, use
  functions that limit length, or ensure that the size is larger than the
  maximum possible length.
    char string[32];

ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Hits = 5
Lines analyzed = 838 in approximately 0.08 seconds (9879 lines/second)
Physical Source Lines of Code (SLOC) = 590
Hits@level = [0]   0 [1]   0 [2]   2 [3]   0 [4]   3 [5]   0
Hits@level+ = [0+]   5 [1+]   5 [2+]   5 [3+]   3 [4+]   3 [5+]   0
Hits/KSLOC@level+ = [0+] 8.47458 [1+] 8.47458 [2+] 8.47458 [3+] 5.08475 [4+] 5.08475 [5+]   0
Dot directories skipped = 2 (--followdotdir overrides)
Minimum risk level = 1
Not every hit is necessarily a security vulnerability.
There may be other security vulnerabilities; review your code!
See 'Secure Programming HOWTO'
(https://dwheeler.com/secure-programs) for more information.