Flawfinder version 2.0.10, (C) 2001-2019 David A. Wheeler. Number of rules (primarily dangerous function names) in C/C++ ruleset: 223 Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/examples/hello_world.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/examples/member_method.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/sigc++/adaptors/adaptors.h Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/sigc++/adaptors/bound_argument.h Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/sigc++/bind.h Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/sigc++/bind_return.h Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/sigc++/connection.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/sigc++/connection.h Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/sigc++/functors/functors.h Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/sigc++/functors/slot_base.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/sigc++/functors/slot_base.h Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/sigc++/reference_wrapper.h Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/sigc++/retype_return.h Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/sigc++/sigc++.h Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/sigc++/signal_base.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/sigc++/signal_base.h Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/sigc++/slot.h Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/sigc++/trackable.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/sigc++/trackable.h Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/sigc++/type_traits.h Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/sigc++/visit_each.h Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tests/benchmark.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tests/test_accum_iter.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tests/test_accumulated.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tests/test_bind.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tests/test_bind_as_slot.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tests/test_bind_ref.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tests/test_bind_refptr.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tests/test_bind_return.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tests/test_compose.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tests/test_copy_invalid_slot.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tests/test_cpp11_lambda.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tests/test_custom.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tests/test_deduce_result_type.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tests/test_disconnect.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tests/test_disconnect_during_emit.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tests/test_exception_catch.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tests/test_functor_trait.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tests/test_hide.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tests/test_limit_reference.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tests/test_mem_fun.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tests/test_ptr_fun.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tests/test_retype.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tests/test_retype_return.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tests/test_signal.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tests/test_signal_move.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tests/test_size.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tests/test_slot.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tests/test_slot_disconnect.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tests/test_slot_move.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tests/test_track_obj.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tests/test_trackable.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tests/test_trackable_move.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tests/test_visit_each.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tests/testutilities.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tests/testutilities.h Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tools/gcc_template_specialization_operator_overload.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tools/have_sun_reverse_iterator.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tools/msvc_template_specialization_operator_overload.cc Examining data/libsigc++-2.0-2.10.4/tools/pragma_push_pop_macro.cc FINAL RESULTS: ANALYSIS SUMMARY: No hits found. Lines analyzed = 7269 in approximately 0.18 seconds (39621 lines/second) Physical Source Lines of Code (SLOC) = 4083 Hits@level = [0] 0 [1] 0 [2] 0 [3] 0 [4] 0 [5] 0 Hits@level+ = [0+] 0 [1+] 0 [2+] 0 [3+] 0 [4+] 0 [5+] 0 Hits/KSLOC@level+ = [0+] 0 [1+] 0 [2+] 0 [3+] 0 [4+] 0 [5+] 0 Dot directories skipped = 1 (--followdotdir overrides) Minimum risk level = 1 There may be other security vulnerabilities; review your code! See 'Secure Programming HOWTO' (https://dwheeler.com/secure-programs) for more information.