Flawfinder version 2.0.10, (C) 2001-2019 David A. Wheeler.
Number of rules (primarily dangerous function names) in C/C++ ruleset: 223
Examining data/ruby-concurrent-1.1.6+dfsg/ext/concurrent-ruby-ext/atomic_boolean.c
Examining data/ruby-concurrent-1.1.6+dfsg/ext/concurrent-ruby-ext/atomic_boolean.h
Examining data/ruby-concurrent-1.1.6+dfsg/ext/concurrent-ruby-ext/atomic_fixnum.c
Examining data/ruby-concurrent-1.1.6+dfsg/ext/concurrent-ruby-ext/atomic_fixnum.h
Examining data/ruby-concurrent-1.1.6+dfsg/ext/concurrent-ruby-ext/atomic_reference.c
Examining data/ruby-concurrent-1.1.6+dfsg/ext/concurrent-ruby-ext/atomic_reference.h
Examining data/ruby-concurrent-1.1.6+dfsg/ext/concurrent-ruby-ext/rb_concurrent.c
Examining data/ruby-concurrent-1.1.6+dfsg/ext/concurrent-ruby-ext/ruby_193_compatible.h

FINAL RESULTS:


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

No hits found.
Lines analyzed = 369 in approximately 0.15 seconds (2544 lines/second)
Physical Source Lines of Code (SLOC) = 288
Hits@level = [0]   0 [1]   0 [2]   0 [3]   0 [4]   0 [5]   0
Hits@level+ = [0+]   0 [1+]   0 [2+]   0 [3+]   0 [4+]   0 [5+]   0
Hits/KSLOC@level+ = [0+]   0 [1+]   0 [2+]   0 [3+]   0 [4+]   0 [5+]   0
Dot directories skipped = 2 (--followdotdir overrides)
Minimum risk level = 1
There may be other security vulnerabilities; review your code!
See 'Secure Programming HOWTO'
(https://dwheeler.com/secure-programs) for more information.