===========================================================
                                      .___ __  __   
          _________________  __ __  __| _/|__|/  |_ 
         / ___\_` __ \__  \ |  |  \/ __ | | \\_  __\
        / /_/  >  | \// __ \|  |  / /_/ | |  ||  |  
        \___  /|__|  (____  /____/\____ | |__||__|  
       /_____/            \/           \/           
              grep rough audit - static analysis tool
                  v2.8 written by @Wireghoul
=================================[justanotherhacker.com]===
r-cran-tgp-2.4-17/vignettes/tgp.Rnw-1344-\end{figure}
r-cran-tgp-2.4-17/vignettes/tgp.Rnw:1345:Progress indicators show where the LLM ({\tt corr=0($d$)}) or the GP
r-cran-tgp-2.4-17/vignettes/tgp.Rnw-1346-is active.  Figure \ref{f:exp:btgpllm} shows how similar the resulting
##############################################
r-cran-tgp-2.4-17/vignettes/tgp2.Rnw-551-\end{equation}
r-cran-tgp-2.4-17/vignettes/tgp2.Rnw:552:where $V_j = \mr{var}(\mbb{E}[z|x_j])$,
r-cran-tgp-2.4-17/vignettes/tgp2.Rnw-553-$V_{ij}=\mr{var}(\mbb{E}[z|x_i, x_j]) - V_i - V_j$, and so on.   Clearly, when the
##############################################
r-cran-tgp-2.4-17/vignettes/tgp2.Rnw-1616-$\pi_{k_i}$ can be obtained by collecting samples
r-cran-tgp-2.4-17/vignettes/tgp2.Rnw:1617:$\theta^{(t)}$ where $k^{(t)} = k_i$.  Samples from $\pi(\theta)$ are
r-cran-tgp-2.4-17/vignettes/tgp2.Rnw-1618-obtained when $k^{(t)} = 1$.
##############################################
r-cran-tgp-2.4-17/vignettes/tgp2.Rnw-1812-$\lambda_2,\dots,\lambda_m = 0$.  It may be tempting to choose
r-cran-tgp-2.4-17/vignettes/tgp2.Rnw:1813:$\lambda_i = W_i/W$, where $W = \sum_{i=1}^m W_i$.  The resulting
r-cran-tgp-2.4-17/vignettes/tgp2.Rnw-1814-estimator is equivalent to
##############################################
r-cran-tgp-2.4-17/inst/doc/tgp.Rnw-1344-\end{figure}
r-cran-tgp-2.4-17/inst/doc/tgp.Rnw:1345:Progress indicators show where the LLM ({\tt corr=0($d$)}) or the GP
r-cran-tgp-2.4-17/inst/doc/tgp.Rnw-1346-is active.  Figure \ref{f:exp:btgpllm} shows how similar the resulting
##############################################
r-cran-tgp-2.4-17/inst/doc/tgp2.Rnw-551-\end{equation}
r-cran-tgp-2.4-17/inst/doc/tgp2.Rnw:552:where $V_j = \mr{var}(\mbb{E}[z|x_j])$,
r-cran-tgp-2.4-17/inst/doc/tgp2.Rnw-553-$V_{ij}=\mr{var}(\mbb{E}[z|x_i, x_j]) - V_i - V_j$, and so on.   Clearly, when the
##############################################
r-cran-tgp-2.4-17/inst/doc/tgp2.Rnw-1616-$\pi_{k_i}$ can be obtained by collecting samples
r-cran-tgp-2.4-17/inst/doc/tgp2.Rnw:1617:$\theta^{(t)}$ where $k^{(t)} = k_i$.  Samples from $\pi(\theta)$ are
r-cran-tgp-2.4-17/inst/doc/tgp2.Rnw-1618-obtained when $k^{(t)} = 1$.
##############################################
r-cran-tgp-2.4-17/inst/doc/tgp2.Rnw-1812-$\lambda_2,\dots,\lambda_m = 0$.  It may be tempting to choose
r-cran-tgp-2.4-17/inst/doc/tgp2.Rnw:1813:$\lambda_i = W_i/W$, where $W = \sum_{i=1}^m W_i$.  The resulting
r-cran-tgp-2.4-17/inst/doc/tgp2.Rnw-1814-estimator is equivalent to